Is RCT a good replacement for Harvest + Endeavor?
My client is using Harvest and Endeavor as SCMs for non-Mainframe and Mainframe code. I would like to propose RTC but the question is whether RTC will remove the need for keeping two separate SCMs (Harvest and Endeavor).
Any expert advice will be really appreciated. Regards, Shaz |
2 answers
Hi Shaz,
I would say 'yes', but all depends on the specific environment and the habits of the customer. RTC is very good to keep track of versions, builds and issues (workitems). Everything is integrated. In our solution that is running in production for several customers now, we only store http://www.asist.be/v1/solutions/documents/ASISTRBDRTCIntegration1.0.pdf contains a general description about our solution that was build to support EGL-code, but it can be adapted for any type of source-code. Regards, Bernd www.asist.be My client is using Harvest and Endeavor as SCMs for non-Mainframe and Mainframe code. I would like to propose RTC but the question is whether RTC will remove the need for keeping two separate SCMs (Harvest and Endeavor). |
Geoffrey Clemm (30.1k●3●30●35)
| answered Dec 09 '10, 1:53 a.m.
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR / FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER
In most cases, I would say "yes".
Unlike Harvest (which does not run on mainframes) and Endeavor (which only runs on mainframes), RTC is designed to run natively on both mainframes and non-mainframes (allowing you to decide where you want your server to run, and then allowing both mainframe and non-mainframe clients to talk to that same common server). Cheers, Geoff On 12/8/2010 12:53 PM, berndyman wrote: Hi Shaz, |
Your answer
Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.