Best practice for work items for customization and upgrades.
All,
In ClearQuest, I would create a schema, I would then add "packages"(if needed) and begin customization. When upgrades of ClearQuest came, I was given the option to upgrade the packages, but my fields were never an issue.
In RTC, are people customizing the out-of-the-box templates, or creating their own first as a copy of the predefined ones? If you have two SCRUM teams that need a new field, is it best to just create a copy of the out of box and begin there? If not, when an upgrade comes with an enhancement in the template, what happens?
Are you all creating copies of things like "com.ibm.team.workitem.workItemType" first, and then customizing it? If not, has an upgrade ever interfered with your customizations?
thanks
|
2 answers
sometimes you modify, sometimes you don't.. we have found that there is built-in behavior based on the ID of some of the process elements.. so you have to be careful (force close of the duplicate only happens if the workflow Id is specific..)
for defect for example, ours is SO different than the base, we made a new one. for story and epic we kept it and added a few fields.. we added our own for Feature and a couple others.. \ so far (2 times) we have not seen any detrimental effect. |
There are different things to think about:
see also my answer in https://jazz.net/forum/questions/87028/can-an-updated-version-of-an-rtc-process-template-be-applied-to-an-existing-project
and this very good article https://jazz.net/library/article/1002
|
Your answer
Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.