DOORS NexGen CLM v6.0.2 vs CLM v6.0.4?
In installing DOORS NG, there is a question as which CLM to install, v6.0.2 vs v6.0.4?
Disregarding issues such as deployments, 1 or 2 servers, and topologies, assume that we have 2 Sites:
One site has DOORS NexGen CLM v6.0.2
Second site has DOORS NexGen CLM v6.0.4.
Question: With engineering firms experiencing growing pains and my role as an experienced DOORS User,
will I see any difference(performance, capabilities, front-end functionalities) between the Two Sites?
Accepted answer
There are some significant new features introduced in 6.0.3 and 6.0.4, so you may not see a direct like-for-like performance comparison between 6.0.2 and 6.0.4.
https://jazz.net/blog/index.php/2016/12/06/whats-new-in-rational-doors-next-generation-6-0-3/
https://jazz.net/blog/index.php/2017/06/15/whats-new-in-rational-doors-next-generation-6-0-4/
You should still be able to get some ideas about the performance by checking the wikis below.
https://jazz.net/wiki/bin/view/Deployment/SizingAndTuningGuideForRationalDOORSNextGenerationVersion602
https://jazz.net/wiki/bin/view/Deployment/SizingAndTuningGuideForDOORSNextGeneration604and605WithComponents
2 other answers
Hi Carlos,
We're using CLM 6.0.2, and we've have had nothing but problems with DNG. We have been told by IBM that many of our problems will be solved or mitigated by moving to 6.0.5.
Comments
Hi Amie,
Comments
Donald Nong
Mar 14 '18, 9:57 p.m.So I think the question is - does DNG 6.0.4 have any performance advantage over DNG 6.0.2? Correct?
Carlos Gonsalez
Mar 15 '18, 9:06 a.m.In the long-term, performance would be an issue; Applicable to Large-Scale DOORSNexGen deployment(future).
For now, a need exists is for a small scale deployment. Thus, using the imaginary 2-Site scenario cited above(v6.0.2 Site versus v6.0.4 Site):
-Would the DOORSNG End-User see a difference of capabilities and functions
offered at the DOORNexGen's front-end menu between my two imaginary sites?