Why is there no indication that a chapter is fold when a view is applied?
Hello!
I don't know if this is a defect or a desired behavior and if it was already reported (I couldn't find). I observed in DNG 5.0.2 and 6.0.1. When I apply a filter for an attribute, the hierarchy of a module gets lost. But when I fold in a chapter before, the chapter will not be unfold when applying the filter. And there is no indication, that there is some content "inside". I think that is very dangerous, when it is not shown that there is something "fold away". Is it a desired behavior, that nothing is shown? Or do I ignore something? Thanks! |
3 answers
I think it is by design. When you apply a filter, the resulted requirements are displayed in a "flat" format. It is quite difficult to maintain a "hierarchy" view if some middle tiers are filtered out, isn't it? If you fold/collapse a chapter/level, it means that you are not interested in the content inside, then why do you want the content to be shown after filtering? If you look at the "showing ## of ## artifacts" message at the bottom, the number does match what is being displayed, whether you collapse a level or not - so I believe this is intended by design.
|
I think I'm not fully understanding, or maybe the behavior is changed (I'm looking at a very recent build). But it looks to me like the folded (collapsed) state of a heading has no effect on how it's displayed when you filter, since filtering displays a flattened list (as mentioned above).
That is, if I collapse a section so I'm only seeing the heading, when I filter the module, it will show the heading and any children (assuming they match the filter), and the heading is not collapsed. On a side note, there is an open enhancement to try to show the hierarchy when filtering. Comments
Christian Winkler
commented Jan 07 '16, 4:39 a.m.
I try to explain my problem again.
|
We would also really appreciate if one couldin a view / with filtered content fold the chapters in and out.
Kirk mentioned work on an enhancement some time ago - would it cover our concern and is this already available? With which version? Thanks in advance! Comments These questions are over 5 years old. It is usually pointless to answer someone elses question with your own question, especially if it is that old.
Here is the new process for creating enhancement requests: https://jazz.net/blog/index.php/2021/09/07/you-spoke-we-listened-were-changing-the-way-ideas-are-submitted-to-ibm/
|
Your answer
Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.