Jazz Forum Welcome to the Jazz Community Forum Connect and collaborate with IBM Engineering experts and users

32-bit Installation Manager required for RRC v4.0.3??

Questions
Tags
Users
Badges
Anthony Kesterton
JAZZ DEVELOPER (7.5k●9●180●136) Aug 07 '13, 2:19 p.m.
I am helping someone install RRC v4.0.3 on a Windows 2008 R3 server (it is a vmware machine, 64-bit, quad virtual core).  We are using Installation Manager and a downloaded repository from jazz.net. 

After we select RRC, JTS and the trial license keys - we get the warning that we should be using the 32-bit IM to install RRC v4.0.3.

Is this an error in IM - I have not noticed this message before when installing on other 64-bit machines.

anthony

0 votes

1 answer
7,085 views
0 votes

One answer

Permanent link
Simon Eickel
(1.1k●7●54●57) Aug 08 '13, 2:28 a.m.
Hi Anthony,

I've checked my situation - I have a Win 2008 R2 server - and there the Installation Manager is installed as a 32bit
application. Why is there no x64 installed?
I assume this explained with the historically fact. In our company we still have Windows XP (32bit) and Windows 7 (32bit). That's why we are using the IM in 32bit company-wide.

With this IM I was able to install all applications on the server as x64 architecture (JTS, RTC, RQM and RRC) and they are working fine.

When I check the Taskmanager during such an installation I don't find the java process to use more than 1xxk of memory ...
So my more general question is - what would be the benefit using an IM in x64 architecture?

Greetings,
Simon

0 votes

Comments
Anthony Kesterton
JAZZ DEVELOPER Aug 08 '13, 3:43 a.m.
Hi Simon Many thanks for checking your setup. This has led me to believe that perhaps the person who downloaded IM picked a 64-bit version (if that is possible) by mistake.  I have something to check up on. As far as the wider question goes of "why have a 64-bit version at all" - bear in mind that Installation Manager is a core IBM technology that is used in other IBM products.  They may have bigger memory requirements.  Also - if you run on a 64-bit system, you may not have the relevant 32-bit libraries available to execute the code.  This is all my impression, and may not be the correct reason :-) anthony

Your answer

Register or log in to post your answer.

Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.

Ask a question
Guidelines
FAQ
Search context
Follow this question

By Email: 

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here.

By RSS:

Answers
Answers and Comments
Question details
× 2,382

Question asked: Aug 07 '13, 2:19 p.m.

Question was seen: 7,085 times

Last updated: Aug 08 '13, 3:43 a.m.

Confirmation Cancel Confirm