This page describes the Alternative SSE Deployment Topologies for version 5.x. Refer to Standard deployment topologies overview for high-level description of the standard topologies, how they are categorized and their key characteristics.
These alternative deployment topologies for the Rational solution for systems and software engineering (SSE) 5.0 are a subset of the standard SSE deployment topologies. For the rest of the standard topologies, see Recommended SSE deployment topologies 5.0.
As of 5.0.1 new installs can share a single instance of JRS. RELM no longer requires a separate instance of JRS installed with a context root of SPARQL_Gateway.
As of 5.0.2 the Lifecycle Project Administration (LPA) application has been incorporated into the Jazz Team Server. It is no longer delivered as a separate WAR application.
Warning: DCC should not be installed if DOORS is the RM provider as data warehouse conflicts will occur. Instead configure the standard ETL jobs for all tools that contribute to the data warehouse.
Metadata Variable | Value |
Operating System | not specified |
Database Management System | not specified |
Application Server | not specified |
License Management System | Floating |
User Management System | Tivoli Directory Server and Microsoft Active Directory |
Other technologies | Reverse Proxy |
This enterprise topology uses Linux for the server operating systems. The applications are distributed across separate servers and WAS instances. A reverse proxy is used to ensure public URI stability. DB2 is used for the databases and is hosted on a separate server. Finally, licenses are served by a floating license server and Tivoli Directory Server provides the LDAP based user management, for all but DOORS/DWA, which uses Windows Active Directory Server.
Note: There have been incidences of the DWA Interops core dumping when processing an RQM Reconcile operation on Linux. To avoid this issue the DWA Interops should be run on a Windows server. This issue is currently under investigation in APAR PI08809 (http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PI07809)
Warning: DCC should not be installed if DOORS is the RM provider as data warehouse conflicts will occur. Instead configure the standard ETL jobs for all tools that contribute to the data warehouse.
Metadata Variable | Value |
Operating System | RHEL |
Database Management System | DB2 |
Application Server | WAS |
License Management System | Floating |
User Management System | Tivoli Directory Server and Microsoft Active Directory |
Other technologies | Reverse Proxy |
Server | Software |
1 | JTS, WAS |
2 | CCM, WAS |
3 | QM, WAS |
4 | RM, WAS |
5 | DCC, WAS |
6 | RS, WAS |
7 | DM, WAS |
8 | RELM, WAS |
9 | VVC, WAS |
10 | LQE, WAS |
11 | DOORS DB |
12 | DWA, Broker, Tomcat |
13 | DOORS Interops (1..n) |
14 | DB2 |
15 | IHS Reverse Proxy Server |
16 | LDAP Server |
17 | License Server |
Note: There have been incidences of the DWA Interops core dumping when processing an RQM Reconcile operation on Linux. To avoid this issue the DWA Interops should be run on a Windows server. This issue is currently under investigation in APAR PI08809 (http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PI07809)
Note: The evaluation topology does not meet the demands of a typical production workload because of the limited scalability of the single application server. While this topology is ideal for evaluations, demonstrations, and training purposes realize that the data created in an evaluation topology cannot be transferred to a scalable production environment when the evaluation is complete.
Every customer's environment is different with unique, necessary and often immutable requirements and constraints. We recognize that these standard topologies may not provide enough detail to make them immediately implementable in some customer environments, but we wanted to describe several topologies with enough variability to give an indication of what is possible and where our recommendations start.
While we recommend customers start with a standard topology that is most applicable to them, we recognize they will need to make changes and customizations to support their own unique requirements and constraints. IBM will support your own implementations, but may ask you to describe which topology is most applicable to your deployment and ask you to document what is unique in your environment to expedite any potential support situation.
To aid you in documenting your chosen deployment topology, we have made the following Rational Software Architect (RSA) model files available:
These may be imported into RSA then further modified or expanded to represent your environment. Look at the Installation_Instructions.txt file for information on how to import the models into RSA.
Find CLM-specific performance datasheets, sizing guidelines and performance-related case studies on the Performance datasheets and sizing guidelines page.
This topic is meant to briefly introduce these standard topologies and describe how they might be applied. Work is already underway to build upon and apply them. Subsequent updates to this topic and supporting topics will provide additional insight into their usage.
Future updates to this topic or supporting topics may cover:
Status icon key: