Ramifications/Recommendations wrt re-registration of CLM application
Hi,
Scenario: Fairly large farm of RTC/RQM Repositories that grew out over the years from RTC 1, 2 and now 3. We created only a few JTS (5) that contain the responsibility of managing a "full" clm (1) born @ 3.0GA, 2 others that manage upgraded RTC, and 2 more that manage upgraded QM (with associated new Requirements Manager projects). This configuration (v3) has been in place for as long as 1y and as little as 4 months. A user has work in 2 RTC repositories (registered to separate JTS) and now wants to have an LPA connecting the RTC and maybe QM and RM into a life cycle project. Now, I know that JTS is more than just the user registry (e.g. warehouse, dashboards, licenses) and that removing a application from a JTS is not to be taken lightly. Are there any recommendations or discouragements of this potential change? Thanks, Kevin |
Accepted answer
Geoffrey Clemm (30.1k●3●30●35)
| answered Aug 23 '12, 10:34 p.m.
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR / FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER
It is a very reasonable thing to want to be able to do, but it is currently not supported (which I guess is a very strong form of discouragement :-).
The work item requesting this functionality is 162280 ( https://jazz.net/jazz/resource/itemName/com.ibm.team.workitem.WorkItem/162280 ). Please feel free to add a comment to that work item indicating your interest/support. Kevin Ramer selected this answer as the correct answer
Comments Goeffrey, Thanks. I'm not inclined to take the step of de-registering an application. I'll look at the work item and maybe subscribe. Kevin |
Your answer
Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.