Jazz Forum Welcome to the Jazz Community Forum Connect and collaborate with IBM Engineering experts and users

Synchronize Attributes as a server job on all open items?

I see there are threads on this dating back to 2009 and was wondering if there are more recent developments.

When adding a new custom field, I often add it to Task, Story, Epic, and Defect. Therefore I need to "Synchronize Attributes" on all open work items. This is generally done manually by running an "all open items" query, selecting all items in the query with control-a, then right-clicking on the Type column and choosing "Synchronize Attributes". That worked fine in the beginning, but we have too many open work items now. I increased query results to 5000 work items, but selecting this many work items and running "Synchronize Attributes" results in "Error running operation 'Synchronizing Attributes'" after about 10 minutes. Thus I have to resort to using ID ranges to break the query into smaller pieces. This makes the process of manually synchronizing attributes quite the pain.

So I would really like to be able to tell the server to run the attribute sync at night. Is this possible yet, or is it still only a client-side manual process?

0 votes


Accepted answer

Permanent link
I've submitted work item 172944 for this enhancement.

Cheers,
Geoff

On 8/1/2011 6:38 PM, mshkolnik wrote:
When adding a new custom field, I often add it to Task, Story, Epic,
and Defect. Therefore I need to "Synchronize Attributes" on
all open work items. This is generally done manually by running an
"all open items" query, selecting all items in the query
with control-a, then right-clicking on the Type column and choosing
"Synchronize Attributes". That worked fine in the
beginning, but we have too many open work items now. I increased
query results to 5000 work items, but selecting this many work items
and running "Synchronize Attributes" results in "Error
running operation 'Synchronizing Attributes'" after about 10
minutes. Thus I have to resort to using ID ranges to break the query
into smaller pieces. This makes the process of manually synchronizing
attributes quite the pain.
Ralph Schoon selected this answer as the correct answer

0 votes

Your answer

Register or log in to post your answer.

Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.

Search context
Follow this question

By Email: 

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here.

By RSS:

Answers
Answers and Comments
Question details

Question asked: Aug 01 '11, 6:27 p.m.

Question was seen: 2,992 times

Last updated: Aug 01 '11, 6:27 p.m.

Confirmation Cancel Confirm