How to delete/archive Defect
Hello,
We are running RQM 2.0.0.1 iFix005 and RQM 2.0.1 iFix003.
We created Defect in RQM (we don't use the bridge or the synchronizer in that case).
We have to delete or archive some Defects. I don't see any options for that.
Is this option exist?
Do I miss something?
Thank you in advance
Pascal Jean
We are running RQM 2.0.0.1 iFix005 and RQM 2.0.1 iFix003.
We created Defect in RQM (we don't use the bridge or the synchronizer in that case).
We have to delete or archive some Defects. I don't see any options for that.
Is this option exist?
Do I miss something?
Thank you in advance
Pascal Jean
4 answers
Hello,
We are running RQM 2.0.0.1 iFix005 and RQM 2.0.1 iFix003.
We created Defect in RQM (we don't use the bridge or the synchronizer in that case).
We have to delete or archive some Defects. I don't see any options for that.
Is this option exist?
Do I miss something?
Thank you in advance
Pascal Jean
Rational Quality Manager (RQM) defect records are based on Rational Team Concert (RTC) work items. In RTC work items, the concept of "deleting" or "archiving" a work item does not exist. You can change states (for example: to close something as "resolved", "no plan to fix", "invalid/duplicate", etc), but after a work item is created it can never be deleted. This is by design and is for audit purposes.
Hello,
We are running RQM 2.0.0.1 iFix005 and RQM 2.0.1 iFix003.
We created Defect in RQM (we don't use the bridge or the synchronizer in that case).
We have to delete or archive some Defects. I don't see any options for that.
Is this option exist?
Do I miss something?
Thank you in advance
Pascal Jean
Rational Quality Manager (RQM) defect records are based on Rational Team Concert (RTC) work items. In RTC work items, the concept of "deleting" or "archiving" a work item does not exist. You can change states (for example: to close something as "resolved", "no plan to fix", "invalid/duplicate", etc), but after a work item is created it can never be deleted. This is by design and is for audit purposes.
Thank you Patrick for this answer.
It becomes more clear now.