It's all about the answers!

Ask a question
QuestionsTagsUsersBadges
Guidelines | FAQ
Follow this question
Question details

×5,946
×2,352

question asked: Jan 06 '17, 12:14 p.m.
question was seen: 2,024 times
last updated: Jan 06 '17, 1:45 p.m.

Related questions

Has anyone upgraded to DOORS Next Gen 6.0.3?

0
1
Carol Watson (735●1●2●19) | asked Jan 06 '17, 12:14 p.m.

My Company is currently planning our upgrade to DOORS Next Gen 6.0.3 and would appreciate hearing from anyone who has already completed the upgrade.  What was your experience?  Any tips on what to watch for, or issues that you encountered?

Thanks,

Carol

One answer

Most liked answers ↑|Newest answers|Oldest answers

0
permanent link
Daniel Barbour (250●3●23) | answered Jan 06 '17, 1:18 p.m.
We recently upgraded from an CLM 6.0.2 (iFix006a) installation to CLM 6.0.3 and had no unusual experience in doing so.  That said - we are not heavy users of the CLM tools (we have fairly small projects that are used for performing ISO 26262 tool validation activities and we needed to migrate our tool qualification artifacts to support 6.0.3).

The only significant observation I would make is that the User Interface for DNG is noticeably different which may require a little getting used to for users who have spent a lot of time working with earlier versions.  (I am not making a judgment call - only an observation)
Comments
Carol Watson commented Jan 06 '17, 1:45 p.m.

Thanks Daniel. Currently the only Rational tools we use are DOORS 9.6 and DOORS Next Gen 6.0.2. We do plan to migrate modules from DOORS to DNG.  We held off doing so until we get 6.0.3 installed because of the migration enhancements included in this release.

Regards,

Carol

Your answer

Register or to post your answer.


Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.