It's all about the answers!

Ask a question
QuestionsTagsUsersBadges
Guidelines | FAQ
Follow this question
Question details

×5,944
×2,352

question asked: Aug 31 '16, 9:14 a.m.
question was seen: 2,497 times
last updated: Sep 01 '16, 1:32 p.m.

Related questions

Oracle vs SQL

0
Brian Brumm (11●1) | asked Aug 31 '16, 9:14 a.m.
 We have both databases. Which one works better with DOORS Next Generation?

One answer

Most liked answers ↑|Newest answers|Oldest answers

0
permanent link
Rosa Naranjo (2.9k●1●17●23) | answered Sep 01 '16, 1:32 p.m.
FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER
Brian
Although we support SQL Server, we find DB2 and Oracle are better to support large Jazz tools environments. Further, we support more of the advanced capabilities of DB2 and Oracle, such as clustered database.

Your question is very general though. 'Works better' can be interpreted in various ways. If you meant performance, then yes, Oracle or DB2 is recommended

Here are some links to our Deployment wiki Performance and HA/DR wiki pages.

https://jazz.net/wiki/bin/view/Deployment/PerformanceWhereToStart
https://jazz.net/wiki/bin/view/Deployment/PerformanceDatasheetsAndSizingGuidelines
https://jazz.net/wiki/bin/view/Deployment/ApproachesToImplementingHAAndDR
https://jazz.net/wiki/bin/view/Deployment/RecommendedALMDeploymentTopologies6

Your answer

Register or to post your answer.


Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.