It's all about the answers!

Ask a question
QuestionsTagsUsersBadges
Guidelines | FAQ
Follow this question
Question details

×42,884
×82
×37
×18

question asked: Jun 24 '14, 1:19 p.m.
question was seen: 4,779 times
last updated: Oct 09 '15, 6:08 p.m.

Related questions

Why separate databases instead of schemas for MS SQL with RTC?

0
Mike Shkolnik (980●9●161●143) | asked Jun 24 '14, 1:19 p.m.
Our DBA wants to know why we have to have separate databases for RTC with SQL Server 2012? The instructions for Oracle use multiple schemas in the same database but the instructions for SQL, even with RTC 5.x which drops support for older than SQL 2012, still uses separate databases instead of schemas. MS SQL has supported multiple schemas since SQL 2005. Can someone please explain this?

One answer

Most liked answers ↑|Newest answers|Oldest answers

0
permanent link
Grazielle Codogno (153●1●6) | answered Oct 09 '15, 6:08 p.m.
Hi Mike,

There's no other explanation for this, than Legacy!
For Oracle , my understanding it was an RFE opened to review this option to create database to create different schemas.
I believe the same can be done for SQLSERVER.
Comments
Grazielle Codogno commented Oct 09 '15, 6:08 p.m.

https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/

Your answer

Register or to post your answer.


Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.