Whose documentation should I trust -- CLM4.0.3 and RRDI 2.01
![]()
There are explicit contradictions with respect to upgrade of RRDI/CLM
https://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/clmhelp/v4r0m3/index.jsp?re=1&topic=/com.ibm.rational.rrdi.admin.doc/topics/c_upgrading_rrdi.html&scope=null Says: RRDI Upgrade compatibilityFor RRDI, the following rules govern upgrades and version compatibility with CLM
Rational Reporting for Development Intelligence If you use the optional program Rational® Reporting for Development Intelligence to customize reports, you should upgrade to the corresponding Rational Reporting for Development Intelligence 2.0.3 release. You must upgrade Rational Reporting for Development Intelligence before you upgrade your server applications. For more information about Rational Reporting for Development Intelligence, see the related section in Reporting and the upgrade process. So, which is presenting falsehood ? |
Accepted answer
![]()
Paul Ellis (1.3k●6●13)
| answered Jul 24 '13, 12:15 p.m.
JAZZ DEVELOPER edited Oct 01 '13, 11:54 a.m. In which case I do not think that you have customisations. We usually see them when linked to another tool where changes are needed for foreign keys etc. As for a leisurely pace, I assume you mean could you continue to use RRDI 2.0.1 before upgrading to version 2.0.3, as opposed to being compelled to upgrade them all together?
I just double-checked that this article is correct with the RRDI development team, Compatability Matrix for RRDI, Insight and CLM (updated link to new matrix - 1st Oct '13), and alas it is.
I should have also mentioned earlier that we are aware of the contradiction you mention and are working on it for the next release.
I hope that this information is useful, even if not exactly what you desired to hear.
Kevin Ramer selected this answer as the correct answer
Comments Well, after looking at the scope of the RRDI and basing it on the install/configure I did for 2.0.1, upgrading to 2.0.3 will inject a significant amount of time in front of upgrading CLM and we have a rather large collection of CLM applications and their associated RRDI and unfortunately our deployment topology has 1 dissenting CCM whose JTS also is potentially the most active of our RRDI users (but that is small).
|
2 other answers
Your answer
Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.