It's all about the answers!

Ask a question

Any Mechanism to get more statistics about the Project and its Usage?


Srikanth Bhushan (16942734) | asked Jun 18 '12, 10:47 a.m.

Any one knows/using any mechanism which can provide more information about the project and its usage without having much Manual Work.

The statistics includes the Number of projects in a Server, the number of assets (Test case, test Plan, Test Script , TER etc) associated with the projects, created dates of each assets and modified dates.

 

Also any way to find which projects are inactive. Over a period of time the number of projects/assets keep growing and monitoring this is critical.

 

I saw no of threads on this without any explicit answers. Hence creating a new one.

2 answers



permanent link
Paul Slauenwhite (8.4k12) | answered Jun 19 '12, 7:37 a.m.
FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER
Agreed.  However, you could write some JavaScript code to generate a dynamic web page.  Alternatively, you could generate a custom report using IBM Rational Publishing Engine (RPE) or IBM Rational Reporting for Development Intelligence (RRDI).

permanent link
Paul Slauenwhite (8.4k12) | answered Jun 19 '12, 6:49 a.m.
FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER
You can use the RQM Reportable REST API's project feed service to resolve limited information on project areas.  In addition, you could GET a test resource feed to determine the number of test resources in a project area including their dates.

Comments
Srikanth Bhushan commented Jun 19 '12, 7:34 a.m.

Thanks Paul. I am aware of the Project and test resource feeds. However its a lot of manual work considering the servers with 100+ active projects. To findout how many Test cases, plans, suites, scripts and TERs for each projects involves lot of manual work in constructing the URLs , opening it and reading the numbers.

Your answer


Register or to post your answer.


Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.