It's all about the answers!

Ask a question
QuestionsTagsUsersBadges
Guidelines | FAQ
Follow this question
Question details

×3,954

question asked: Mar 08 '12, 5:02 p.m.
question was seen: 4,346 times
last updated: Mar 08 '12, 5:02 p.m.

Related questions

Register >1 RM with JTS? Roadmap?

0
Todd Dunnavant (57●10●19) | asked Mar 08 '12, 5:02 p.m.
Are there any considerations for enabling multiple RMs to be registered with a single JTS? This is needed to support improved scalability and flexibility of administration, among other benefits.

3 answers

Most liked answers ↑|Newest answers|Oldest answers

0
permanent link
Kevin Ramer (4.5k●9●186●201) | answered Mar 09 '12, 1:15 p.m.
Are there any considerations for enabling multiple RMs to be registered with a single JTS? This is needed to support improved scalability and flexibility of administration, among other benefits.


Not an expert, but I think 1 RM / JTS
0
permanent link
Todd Dunnavant (57●10●19) | answered Mar 09 '12, 1:27 p.m.
Not an expert, but I think 1 RM / JTS



Hi, Kevin, I agree that is the current limitation. My question is, does IBM have any plans on the roadmap to make RM architecturally equivalent with CCM and RQM? Those capabilities enable multiple component instances to be registered with a given JTS. The ability to do this is extremely beneficial for Enterprise-scale users.
0
permanent link
Robin Bater (3.4k●4●7) | answered Mar 09 '12, 1:52 p.m.
JAZZ DEVELOPER
Are there any considerations for enabling multiple RMs to be registered with a single JTS? This is needed to support improved scalability and flexibility of administration, among other benefits.


Hi Todd,

Please look at this plan item

https://jazz.net/jazz03/web/projects/Requirements%20Management#action=com.ibm.team.workitem.viewWorkItem&id=44261

You will see on the commitment tab that it was deferred for the next major release. Please add any comments for the justification for future releases.

Your answer

Register or to post your answer.


Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.