RQM 2-weight distribution independently set of Actual Result
![]()
We use RQM 2.0.1.1 iFix 2.
A behavior one of our test teams don't understand is that the Weight Distribution of Execution Records can be independently set of the actual result.For example, the actual result is set to "Passed", but 100% weight points are set to failed. The testers expected the Is this the way it should work or something we need to correct and understand? Thank you, Zica |
2 answers
![]()
On 8/8/2011 7:38 AM, zvalsan wrote:
We use RQM 2.0.1.1 iFix 2. RQM only computes an Actual Result when the test case/script execution first completes. After that the user needs to manually modify the Actual Result when changing the weight distribution. Currently this isn't automatically done for you. In fact different customers want different behavior. For example, there maybe some failed points lets say (10 points failed and 90 points passed). In some circumstances it's possible the tester consider the Actual Result as passed. And having Actual Result be set for them each time they save the result would get in the way. However, to help ensure there is some cohesiveness between Actual Result and weight points in RQM 3.0.1, there's a warning when the Actual Result is set to a verdict for which there are no weight points. So if they say Actual Result is passed but 100% weight points are set to failed, then they will be warned of this condition and given the option to continue or not. |
![]()
Thank you Kurtis, that help us to understand how it works.
|
Your answer
Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.