RC3 or Beta3 ?
8 answers
What Robert says is correct, but for folks that like to live on the
edge, note that since we are in the release-candidate phase, no schema
changes are permitted, so upgrading from RC3 to the final release
candidate will only require installing the new bits, shutting down the
RC3 server, and the firing up the final release candidate server.
Cheers,
Geoff
rconnell wrote:
edge, note that since we are in the release-candidate phase, no schema
changes are permitted, so upgrading from RC3 to the final release
candidate will only require installing the new bits, shutting down the
RC3 server, and the firing up the final release candidate server.
Cheers,
Geoff
rconnell wrote:
Hi. I would recommend to you to stick with what is the current
default download (1.0Beta3). Official betas also tend to provide you
with a smoother upgrade path to future releases.
Thank you also Geoff,
Ops, for this kind of tests I don't mind to live on the edge.
But you said something strong: "from RC3 to the final release candidate will only require installing the new bits, shutting down the RC3 server, and the firing up the final release candidate server.".
I liked that and I was just thinking about that as I saw RC4.
(btw, I just downloaded almost 400MB for Beta3, them 400MB for RC3 ... should I download more 400MB for RC4 ? not that is a problem, but ... I liked the idea of the "new bits" (or delta-bits).
Why not such delta between RC3 and RC4 ? (Is RC4 the final RC?)
I'm little confuse now: Beta3 or RC4 ?
Thank you
Marcio
Ops, for this kind of tests I don't mind to live on the edge.
But you said something strong: "from RC3 to the final release candidate will only require installing the new bits, shutting down the RC3 server, and the firing up the final release candidate server.".
I liked that and I was just thinking about that as I saw RC4.
(btw, I just downloaded almost 400MB for Beta3, them 400MB for RC3 ... should I download more 400MB for RC4 ? not that is a problem, but ... I liked the idea of the "new bits" (or delta-bits).
Why not such delta between RC3 and RC4 ? (Is RC4 the final RC?)
I'm little confuse now: Beta3 or RC4 ?
Thank you
Marcio
There will be an RC5 (June 6).
The Team Concert schedule is posted to jazz.net (of course :-).
See <https>.
The changes from RC3 to RC4 and RC4 to RC5 will be very minimal (message
improvements, uniform copyrights, late-breaking bug-fixes), so there's
no need to upgrade unless you enjoy being on the "latest".
So the recommendation from Robert is the simplest ... wait to upgrade
until a new release is the "recommended" release at jazz.net.
Cheers,
Geoff
MarcioAB wrote:
The Team Concert schedule is posted to jazz.net (of course :-).
See <https>.
The changes from RC3 to RC4 and RC4 to RC5 will be very minimal (message
improvements, uniform copyrights, late-breaking bug-fixes), so there's
no need to upgrade unless you enjoy being on the "latest".
So the recommendation from Robert is the simplest ... wait to upgrade
until a new release is the "recommended" release at jazz.net.
Cheers,
Geoff
MarcioAB wrote:
Thank you also Geoff,
Ops, for this kind of tests I don't mind to live on the edge.
But you said something strong: "from RC3 to the final release
candidate will only require installing the new bits, shutting down
the RC3 server, and the firing up the final release candidate
server.".
I liked that and I was just thinking about that as I saw RC4.
(btw, I just downloaded almost 400MB for Beta3, them 400MB for RC3 ...
should I download more 400MB for RC4 ? not that is a problem, but ...
I liked the idea of the "new bits" (or delta-bits).
Why not such delta between RC3 and RC4 ? (Is RC4 the final RC?)
I'm little confuse now: Beta3 or RC4 ?
Thank you
Marcio