Jazz Forum Welcome to the Jazz Community Forum Connect and collaborate with IBM Engineering experts and users

Migrating an existing server from 2.0.0.2 to 3.0

I have a current 2.0.0.2 server with a DB2 backend. I need to upgrade that server to 3.0. I have seen the following process in a previous post, but based on M8 ... is this still the proper process?

1) install 3.0 (check "migrate" checkbox to keep URI)
2) create new DB in DB2 (is this both the JTS and CCM databases)
3) export 2.0.0.2 repository using repotools (is this using the 2.0.0.2 repotools? or the 3.0 repotools?
4) modify teamserver.properties (3.0 server) to point to new DB (I assume JTS and CCM databases created in step 2)
5) run jazz setup, confirm DB connectivity to NEW DBs
6) run 3.0 repotools to import the 2002 repository exported in step 3
7) run repotools -addTables (does this just add NEW tables that did not exist in the 2002 repository?)
8) run repotools -reIndex

Again, is this correct? Is there a better way now? Is this supported?

Susan

0 votes



One answer

Permanent link
Migration from RTC 2.0.0.2 to 3.0 is supported; please see

http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/clmhelp/v3r0/topic/com.ibm.jazz.install.doc/topics/c_upgrade_overview.html

for the instructions.

I have a current 2.0.0.2 server with a DB2 backend. I need to upgrade that server to 3.0. I have seen the following process in a previous post, but based on M8 ... is this still the proper process?

1) install 3.0 (check "migrate" checkbox to keep URI)
2) create new DB in DB2 (is this both the JTS and CCM databases)
3) export 2.0.0.2 repository using repotools (is this using the 2.0.0.2 repotools? or the 3.0 repotools?
4) modify teamserver.properties (3.0 server) to point to new DB (I assume JTS and CCM databases created in step 2)
5) run jazz setup, confirm DB connectivity to NEW DBs
6) run 3.0 repotools to import the 2002 repository exported in step 3
7) run repotools -addTables (does this just add NEW tables that did not exist in the 2002 repository?)
8) run repotools -reIndex

Again, is this correct? Is there a better way now? Is this supported?

Susan

0 votes

Your answer

Register or log in to post your answer.

Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.

Search context
Follow this question

By Email: 

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here.

By RSS:

Answers
Answers and Comments
Question details

Question asked: Jan 07 '11, 3:27 p.m.

Question was seen: 5,216 times

Last updated: Jan 07 '11, 3:27 p.m.

Confirmation Cancel Confirm