Jazz Forum Welcome to the Jazz Community Forum Connect and collaborate with IBM Engineering experts and users

How is the sorting algorithm for "Planned For" realized

Questions
Tags
Users
Badges
Rene Beck
(56●2●2●4) edited
Sep 19 '23, 8:53 a.m.

We've created a simple query in EWM to view all items over different iterations.

When executing the query and set it to "Ascending" sorting for "Planned For" the sorting of the results looks strange, because it's neither alphabetical nor by Start or End Date of the iteration.




Can somebody tell me the real sorting criteria behind this?

Thanks in advance for your support!

René

0 votes

Comments
Ralph Schoon
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR / FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER Sep 19 '23, 7:44 a.m.

I am not sure how the sorting of planned for is done. I just would like to remind that in work item queries, there is only an option to sort ascending and descending. It does not say alphabetical. 

Rene Beck
Sep 19 '23, 8:53 a.m.

Thanks for the hint Ralph. I've corrected the issue description. 

0 answers
332 views
0 votes

Be the first one to answer this question!

Register or log in to post your answer.

Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.

Ask a question
Guidelines
FAQ
Search context
Follow this question

By Email: 

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here.

By RSS:

Answers
Answers and Comments
Question details

Question asked: Sep 18 '23, 9:26 a.m.

Question was seen: 332 times

Last updated: Sep 19 '23, 8:53 a.m.

Confirmation Cancel Confirm