How to query a customized attribute with type iteration in JRS?
![]()
Hi Someone who may concern,
We are working on RTC 6.0.4.
We have a customized attribute with type as iteration in our RTC project. we can query this attribute and add this attribute in column display in RTC directly. however, when we tried to query it in JRS, we found we can not find this attribute in condition or in column display.
At the same time, the default attribute "Plan For"'s type is also iteration, it can be shown in JRS as condition or column display.
So, we tried to create a customized attribute with type as iteration in other project, the issue is the same.
So we are wondering whether JRS can not support to show customized attribute with type iteration?
Or, we need to configure something to make it show up?
Thanks!
Best Regards,
Jane Zhou
|
One answer
![]() Hi Jane,
Comments Hi Kenji,
Thanks for your reply!
May I clarify the way you suggest to do test?
In JRS, in "Format Results" tab, select Advanced
And in section "SPARQL query", write the sql sentence you suggest?
I have tried, delete all contents in this section, and only write the sentence you mentioned, then click Validate Query,
Then, I got the following error:
CRRGW5605E An com.hp.hpl.jena.query.QueryParseException error occurred when validating the input SPARQL string, caused by Lexical error at line 2, column 44. Encountered: <EOF> after : "RICALM.REQUEST_ITERATION_EXT ". 10:47:18 AM Could you provide us more detailed on how to run the query for iteration?
Thanks!
Best Regards,
Jane Zhou
There is a misunderstanding. I assume you are using DWH data source, but actually it is LQE. Please mention which data source you are using in JRS in your first question because they are very different. I do not have answer for LQE. Will update if I have something.
Hi Kenji,
Sorry, I did not realized the data source will impact the result.
Yes, our IT said DWH is stopped to update, we need to use LQE as data source.
Thanks!
Best Regards,
Jane Zhou
I only find this description.
showing 5 of 6
show 1 more comments
|