RQM is too slow.
12 answers
AmrBanna wrote:
I have asked the same thing here and it seems there was not any
recommendation about tunning or improving performance (or I didn't get
any response). The general recommendation always was move to the last
version 1.0.1.1.
I opened following "defect" some weeks ago so perhaps you can reuse it
adding your feeling and specific data:
https://jazz.net/jazz02/web/projects/Rational%20Quality%20Manager#action=com.ibm.team.workitem.viewWorkItem&id=17459
Regards,
Chemi.
Hi,
We use RQM for production. We are in the phase of Test Case
creation. We have 1500+ test cases up till now. A lot of test cases
have screen shots.
The issue is, RQM is very slow. Are there any hints and tips that
could help tune RQM?
Could you please advise?
Thank You,
Banna
I have asked the same thing here and it seems there was not any
recommendation about tunning or improving performance (or I didn't get
any response). The general recommendation always was move to the last
version 1.0.1.1.
I opened following "defect" some weeks ago so perhaps you can reuse it
adding your feeling and specific data:
https://jazz.net/jazz02/web/projects/Rational%20Quality%20Manager#action=com.ibm.team.workitem.viewWorkItem&id=17459
Regards,
Chemi.
AmrBanna wrote:
That is kind of a vague question. What are using for database, is it on
a separate server, what kind of server are you using, etc. We have over
220 users on our server with more test cases and artifacts than you
describe and we are seeing no performance problems.
Hi,
We use RQM for production. We are in the phase of Test Case
creation. We have 1500+ test cases up till now. A lot of test cases
have screen shots.
The issue is, RQM is very slow. Are there any hints and tips that
could help tune RQM?
Could you please advise?
Thank You,
Banna
That is kind of a vague question. What are using for database, is it on
a separate server, what kind of server are you using, etc. We have over
220 users on our server with more test cases and artifacts than you
describe and we are seeing no performance problems.
That is kind of a vague question. What are using for database, is it on
a separate server, what kind of server are you using, etc. We have over
220 users on our server with more test cases and artifacts than you
describe and we are seeing no performance problems.
OS: Microsoft Windows Server 2003 - Standard Edition
DB: IBM Derby SDK 10.3.2.2 (included with Rational Quality Manager)
*** All installation packages exist on a single node. ***
For any further details, please let me know.
Thank You,
Amr Banna
Guys,
The performance has been massively increased by using FireFox and Google Chrome. The performance was horrible using IE.
It seems this is something with Plug-ins or applets. They are more compatible FireFox and Google Chrome.
Out of the topic, IE v6.x is not fully compatible with RQM. IE v7.x is much better.
Thank You,
Amr Banna
The performance has been massively increased by using FireFox and Google Chrome. The performance was horrible using IE.
It seems this is something with Plug-ins or applets. They are more compatible FireFox and Google Chrome.
Out of the topic, IE v6.x is not fully compatible with RQM. IE v7.x is much better.
Thank You,
Amr Banna
AmrBanna wrote:
I have also found that new FF 3.5 (although not supported) seems to be
faster. To much JavaScript and AJAX stuff in RQM pages... :-)
Regards,
Chemi.
Guys,
The performance has been massively increased by using FireFox and
Google Chrome. The performance was horrible using IE.
It seems this is something with Plug-ins or applets. They are more
compatible FireFox and Google Chrome.
Out of the topic, IE v6.x is not fully compatible with RQM. IE v7.x is
much better.
Thank You,
Amr Banna
I have also found that new FF 3.5 (although not supported) seems to be
faster. To much JavaScript and AJAX stuff in RQM pages... :-)
Regards,
Chemi.
page 1of 1 pagesof 2 pages