Can DM and CLM 5.0 coexist on the same hardware box?
Hello
We have worked with Design Manager (RSADM) version 4.x, and found issues having DM and RRC working on the same server due to the graphical environment, per Rational Support's advice we migrated DM to another box and now it has been working fine.
We want to set up a new environment with version 5.0 and we want to know if DM would have the same issues working on the same box with CLM.
Has anybody around worked on CLM 5.0 with DM in the same box?
Any issues found with this version?
We have worked with Design Manager (RSADM) version 4.x, and found issues having DM and RRC working on the same server due to the graphical environment, per Rational Support's advice we migrated DM to another box and now it has been working fine.
We want to set up a new environment with version 5.0 and we want to know if DM would have the same issues working on the same box with CLM.
Has anybody around worked on CLM 5.0 with DM in the same box?
Any issues found with this version?
Accepted answer
Hi Donaji,
The same restriction applies to DM 5.0 and RDNG 5.0 (formerly known as RRC) on the same box. It is actually only the "converter" component of RDNG that cannot co-exist with DM. So if you are not using graphical artifacts (sketch/part/diagram), or have delegated the converter component to another machine, you can run RDNG and DM on the same box. Otherwise, you need to delegate the converter component as the underlying technology of DM and the converter has not changed in 5.0. Hope it helps,
The same restriction applies to DM 5.0 and RDNG 5.0 (formerly known as RRC) on the same box. It is actually only the "converter" component of RDNG that cannot co-exist with DM. So if you are not using graphical artifacts (sketch/part/diagram), or have delegated the converter component to another machine, you can run RDNG and DM on the same box. Otherwise, you need to delegate the converter component as the underlying technology of DM and the converter has not changed in 5.0. Hope it helps,