It's all about the answers!

Ask a question

Messages from tomcat server during upgrade


Sterling Ferguson-II (1.6k7256259) | asked Dec 10 '13, 7:59 p.m.
edited Dec 11 '13, 6:53 a.m. by Paul Slauenwhite (8.3k12)
After following the upgrade instructions, I have:

SLF4J: Class path contains multiple SLF4J bindings.
SLF4J: Found binding in [bundleresource://177.fwk945305688/org/slf4j/impl/Static
LoggerBinder.class]
SLF4J: Found binding in [bundleresource://177.fwk945305688:1/org/slf4j/impl/Stat
icLoggerBinder.class]
SLF4J: Found binding in [bundleresource://177.fwk945305688:2/org/slf4j/impl/Stat
icLoggerBinder.class]
SLF4J: Found binding in [bundleresource://177.fwk945305688:3/org/slf4j/impl/Stat
icLoggerBinder.class]
SLF4J: Found binding in [bundleresource://177.fwk945305688:4/org/slf4j/impl/Stat
icLoggerBinder.class]
SLF4J: Found binding in [bundleresource://177.fwk945305688:5/org/slf4j/impl/Stat
icLoggerBinder.class]
SLF4J: Found binding in [bundleresource://177.fwk945305688:6/org/slf4j/impl/Stat
icLoggerBinder.class]
SLF4J: See http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#multiple_bindings for an explanation.

And the RM migration page never appears...any ideas?

Comments
Robert Carter commented Feb 12 '14, 2:34 p.m.

Did you ever get this figured out?


Sterling Ferguson-II commented Feb 12 '14, 2:36 p.m.

No, I had to restore from backup and do the upgrade again.

One answer



permanent link
Don Yang (7.2k2194128) | answered Feb 17 '14, 10:47 p.m.
With no further info such as migration log etc, it is not clear why "RM migration page never appears" occurs. However, that should not relate to the warnings "SLF4J: Class path contains multiple SLF4J bindings." which is harmless and can be ignored as per http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#multiple_bindings.
In my local v4.0.5, I also see the same warning message when starting Tomcat service but I have no problem in using the application at all.

Comments
Eitan Shomrai commented Apr 03 '14, 7:01 a.m.

I have a customer that is quite bothered by these messages.
Is there any solution/workaround NOT to get those irritating warnings?


Nate Decker commented Jun 24 '14, 1:15 p.m.

I saw a post outside of Jazz.net that indicated this kind of thing can be handled by specifying an "exclusion" statement in the XML somewhere. Presumably in the plugin.xml of any custom extensions?

I'd like to try this, but I'm not sure where to put the exclusion statement.

Your answer


Register or to post your answer.