It's all about the answers!

Ask a question
QuestionsTagsUsersBadges
Guidelines | FAQ
Follow this question
Question details

×10,960

question asked: Nov 20 '12, 9:07 a.m.
question was seen: 3,698 times
last updated: Nov 20 '12, 11:43 p.m.

Related questions

RQM crashes RFT adapter

0
Brian Cam (63●1●8●8) | asked Nov 20 '12, 9:07 a.m.
When I run a test suite from RQM, after it finishes the first script and starts the second one, the RFT adapter would disappear or crash.  My RQM version is 3.0.1, RFT 8.2.2.1 and JRE 6 update 22.  I have downgraded RFT to 8.2.2 and re-installed the JRE but the problem still exists.  Any ideas what is wrong?  Is RFT 8.2.2.x compatible with RQM 3.0.1?  At the moment I can't upgrade to RQM 4 yet since my server is 32-bit.
Comments
Ara Masrof commented Nov 20 '12, 10:05 a.m.
JAZZ DEVELOPER

Brian,

One thing that may be helpful is to increase the logging for the adapter to additional data at runtime. This technote outlines how the default logging can be modified

Accepted answer

0
permanent link
Pramod Chandoria (2.1k●1●12●20) | answered Nov 20 '12, 11:43 p.m.
JAZZ DEVELOPER
There is a known issue, Suite execution will not work with latest version of RFT adapters if RQM version is not upgraded to 3015. See this issue Escalation 221160 : Unable to complete executing RFT test via RQM, Test Suite Execution Record for the run shows that it is "In Progress". (71259)
However this causes Suite execution to remain In-Progress and suite execution does not complete.

In your case, even the RFT adapter is crashing.
Please submit a defect against RFT for crash problem
Brian Cam selected this answer as the correct answer

One other answer

Most liked answers ↑|Newest answers|Oldest answers

0
permanent link
Brian Cam (63●1●8●8) | answered Nov 20 '12, 10:01 a.m.
It worked after I rolled RFT back to version 8.2.1.1.  So apparently, RFT newer than 8.2.1.1 will not work with RQM 3.0.1.

Your answer

Register or to post your answer.


Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.