Jazz Forum Welcome to the Jazz Community Forum Connect and collaborate with IBM Engineering experts and users

best way to deliver initial set of files

I do have a need to promote almost 100,000 files to a stream in RTC source code control into one component. I am looking for best ways to do this. I observed that the workspace to show unresolved changes only takes very long time and then check-in and deliver failed after processing very long.

0 votes



2 answers

Permanent link
How is the share failing? OutOfMemory? Timeout?

If you have having OOM errors it may be worth adjusting the client memory settings. This can be done by editing the eclipse.ini file which is a sibling of your executable. I have set -Xmx1024m in my client and successfully shared 85,000 files at a time.

For timeout problems (usually when the files are large) you may wish to adjust your repository timeout value (in the repository's properties dialog in the Team Artifacts view) to be something larger. (I use 3600 instead of the default 480)

1 vote


Permanent link
Hi, are you aware of https://jazz.net/library/article/814

<<<<<<<<<<quote>>>>>>>
Source Control: We recommend 50K files and folders in a single component and if you have more files to split them into multiple components. We encourage individual users to keep less than 300 change sets suspended. While there is no limitation, there is a tendency for a large suspended set to slow down operations involving the suspended set (suspend, resume, and discard) as well as add some additional cost when refreshing or changing collaborations. We have tested the user experience of working with a large number of components in workspaces and streams. There are no known issues with having hundreds of components in a stream or workspace, and we have tested the user experience with 500 components in collaboration.
<<<<<<<<<<quote>>>>>>>

So I would expect it to be slow. Are you trying to share the first time or are you delivering?

0 votes

Comments

Actually I have refreshed my workspace to get unresolved local changes, then tried checkin and deliver. The refresh itself took very long time, then checkin and deliver failed

I would suggest to check in first, potentially several time if errors happen and then deliver later. It might be a good idea to split checkin into several change sets.

Your answer

Register or log in to post your answer.

Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.

Search context
Follow this question

By Email: 

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here.

By RSS:

Answers
Answers and Comments
Question details

Question asked: Aug 23 '12, 8:12 a.m.

Question was seen: 4,224 times

Last updated: Aug 23 '12, 12:53 p.m.

Confirmation Cancel Confirm