iRAM Life Cycle with template showing review process applied
![]()
The following suggestion was put forth on behalf of Christian Strauer
============================================= Suggestion A spreadsheet which contains formal review criteria would help to make the review process more transparent to the asset owners Example criteria: Asset quality like structure and content Formal criteria like asset description, tags and selected categories Value for reuse . In legacy review processes, attachments could be added to a review With the new lifecycle concept only comments can be provided |
One answer
![]()
Ideally, community specific review criteria could be added to lifecycles directly via form fields instead of using a spreadsheet.
|
Your answer
Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.