It's all about the answers!

Ask a question
QuestionsTagsUsersBadges
Guidelines | FAQ
Follow this question
Question details

×1,305

question asked: Mar 17 '11, 6:08 a.m.
question was seen: 5,667 times
last updated: Mar 17 '11, 6:08 a.m.

Related questions

iRAM Life Cycle with template showing review process applied

0
iRAM Administrator (315●2●156●135) | asked Mar 17 '11, 6:08 a.m.
The following suggestion was put forth on behalf of Christian Strauer
=============================================

Suggestion
A spreadsheet which contains formal review criteria would help to make the review process more transparent to the asset owners

Example criteria:
Asset quality like structure and content
Formal criteria like asset description, tags and selected categories
Value for reuse
.
In legacy review processes, attachments could be added to a review
With the new lifecycle concept only comments can be provided

One answer

Most liked answers ↑|Newest answers|Oldest answers

0
permanent link
Christian Strauer (6) | answered Mar 17 '11, 11:07 a.m.
Ideally, community specific review criteria could be added to lifecycles directly via form fields instead of using a spreadsheet.

Your answer

Register or to post your answer.


Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.