RQM ClearQuest Bridge has stopped working
We have had the RQM - ClearQuest bridge successfully deployed since May with no issues. Within the last few days the Bridge has stopped working and is generating the following error when trying to create a Defect from a failed Execution Result:
The following server error occurred when connecting to the external provider. Please check with your administrator and try again later. Error 500: CRVSV0134E The value for property 'form-data-as-xml' is not in this proxy; it has not been set by the client nor requested from the server. We have opened a PMR with IBM, but so far we do not have a solution. Any thoughts? |
3 answers
We're investigating this problem now, and of course support will be in contact about the PMR. I will follow up here if we find a workaround.
Thanks for your patience. |
Can you try validating your CQ schema in the Designer? If there are any errors or warnings, fixing them might work around this problem.
- Thanks, Sam |
We may have found a workaround for this problem.
The issue appears to be a problem with a list view control on a form. Somehow, the "Field Name" (or "Source Field") property for a list view's column header is being being removed from the schema. The fix is to set a value for the column header's "Field Name" property. You can do that by following these steps: 1. In CQ Web, attempt to create a new record for ALL record types in your schema, even those not used by your RQM/CQ integration. 2. Note if any record types return a server 500 error instead of displaying the create record dialog. 3. For the record types that return a server 500, view their forms in CQ Designer. 4. For those forms in question, inspect all list view control column headers and verify they have a "Field Name" (or "Source Field", if you're using the Eclipse based CQ Designer) value. If they do not, specify a value. 5. Save the schema, apply it to your database, clear browser cache, and try again. |
Your answer
Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.