It's all about the answers!

Ask a question
QuestionsTagsUsersBadges
Guidelines | FAQ
Follow this question
Question details

×42,860

question asked: Jul 07 '10, 12:17 p.m.
question was seen: 4,977 times
last updated: Jul 07 '10, 12:17 p.m.

Related questions

Team Areas

0
Danil Suits (81●17●7) | asked Jul 07 '10, 12:17 p.m.
What are the best practices around team areas? Are there surprises lurking for a team that naively assumes that team and subteam organization should match the organization of the human team assets?

One answer

Most liked answers ↑|Newest answers|Oldest answers

0
permanent link
Geoffrey Clemm (30.1k●3●30●35) | answered Jul 07 '10, 4:52 p.m.
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR / FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER
What I usually recommend is that team areas be defined in terms of
"units of planning", i.e. a team consists of the group of people that
share a common iteration/sprint plan. In most cases, this aligns with
the organizational team boundaries, in which case the "naive" approach
works just fine.

Cheers,
Geoff

On 7/7/2010 12:23 PM, Danil wrote:
What are the best practices around team areas? Are there surprises
lurking for a team that naively assumes that team and subteam
organization should match the organization of the human team assets?

Your answer

Register or to post your answer.


Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.