Jazz Forum Welcome to the Jazz Community Forum Connect and collaborate with IBM Engineering experts and users

What constitutes a "suspect"

Does anybody know specifically what constitutes integration with RQM and ReqPro to mark a test plan or case with the suspect value - we are not seeing the tool behave as we expected - we're wondering if only certain changes in ReqPro get mapped back as suspect as opposed to all changes to a requirement :roll:

0 votes



3 answers

Permanent link
Hi,
We have RQM-ReqPro integration and suspect feature works for us as expected. There are few steps that needs to be done to

1) Whenever there is any change for a requirement, you should either force synchronize or schedule synchronization to reflect the changes in RQM. You should see the modified requirement status become to 'updated' now.

2) You should have the test case/test plan linked to the requirements. Only then you can see the status of these associated test cases/test plan changed to "suspect".

Hope this helps.



Does anybody know specifically what constitutes integration with RQM and ReqPro to mark a test plan or case with the suspect value - we are not seeing the tool behave as we expected - we're wondering if only certain changes in ReqPro get mapped back as suspect as opposed to all changes to a requirement :roll:

0 votes


Permanent link
Hi,
We have RQM-ReqPro integration and suspect feature works for us as expected. There are few steps that needs to be done to

1) Whenever there is any change for a requirement, you should either force synchronize or schedule synchronization to reflect the changes in RQM. You should see the modified requirement status become to 'updated' now.

2) You should have the test case/test plan linked to the requirements. Only then you can see the status of these associated test cases/test plan changed to "suspect".

Hope this helps.


Thanks that's exactly what we do have, the question was however, what triggers the suspect .. what value in reqpro triggers that ? it is a change to text, description, attribute value changes ... anything or specific data ?



Does anybody know specifically what constitutes integration with RQM and ReqPro to mark a test plan or case with the suspect value - we are not seeing the tool behave as we expected - we're wondering if only certain changes in ReqPro get mapped back as suspect as opposed to all changes to a requirement :roll:

0 votes


Permanent link
As far as I know its the text which triggers it. I am not sure about other fields.

Hi,
We have RQM-ReqPro integration and suspect feature works for us as expected. There are few steps that needs to be done to

1) Whenever there is any change for a requirement, you should either force synchronize or schedule synchronization to reflect the changes in RQM. You should see the modified requirement status become to 'updated' now.

2) You should have the test case/test plan linked to the requirements. Only then you can see the status of these associated test cases/test plan changed to "suspect".

Hope this helps.


Thanks that's exactly what we do have, the question was however, what triggers the suspect .. what value in reqpro triggers that ? it is a change to text, description, attribute value changes ... anything or specific data ?



Does anybody know specifically what constitutes integration with RQM and ReqPro to mark a test plan or case with the suspect value - we are not seeing the tool behave as we expected - we're wondering if only certain changes in ReqPro get mapped back as suspect as opposed to all changes to a requirement :roll:

0 votes

Your answer

Register or log in to post your answer.

Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.

Search context
Follow this question

By Email: 

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here.

By RSS:

Answers
Answers and Comments
Question details

Question asked: Apr 28 '10, 2:37 p.m.

Question was seen: 6,737 times

Last updated: Apr 28 '10, 2:37 p.m.

Confirmation Cancel Confirm