Is there a way to require a unit test is added for each file
I would like to require that when a file is checked in that there is a corresponding unit test also checked in (or that it exists).
Is there a pre-existing rule for this? Or if not, has anyone created one? |
One answer
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:23:02 +0100, bpatten
<wrpatten> wrote: Hi there, we have a process advisor "Require JUnit Test Run" that can be bound to deliver operations. It can be configured to require a run of a specific test suite for a project area, team, stream (e.g., the maintenance stream) and even an iteration. It can prevent the delivery of changes into a stream if the associated test suite did not run and all tests passed. The advisor, however, does not take coverage information or file-to-test associations into account. In workitem 93846 we're discussing the introduction of change-based coverage to JUnit test runs. A change coverage process advisor could for example enforce a full test coverage of all changes delivered to a (maintenance) stream. If you're interested, add a description of your use case to that workitem. Thanks, Jan. https://jazz.net/jazz/resource/itemName/com.ibm.team.workitem.WorkItem/93846 I would like to require that when a file is checked in that there is a -- Jan Wloka Jazz Work Item Team |
Your answer
Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.