Currently, there are two issues: 1. Using GC, we can obtain the project and components, but cannot retrieve the artifacts in RM. 2. Using RM, we can get partial information about the artifacts, but cannot obtain the artifact types (e.g., Information, So
Currently, there are two issues:
-
1.Using GC, we can obtain the project and components, but cannot retrieve the artifacts in RM.
-
2.Using RM, we can get partial information about the artifacts, but cannot obtain the artifact types (e.g., Information, Software Requirements). However, ultimately, we may still need to go through GC to access the generating information of the RM artifacts.
One answer
> Using GC, we can obtain the project and components, but cannot retrieve the artifacts in RM.
By "using" I guess you mean by accessing the GCM application use a url starting e.g. /gc? - that's expected behaviour that you can't access artifacts because these are owned/managed entirely by /rm
> we can get partial information about the artifacts
Resourceshapes (i.e. type definitions) are all published in the (configuration-specific) services.xml.
In 7.1 there's the first part of a new API to access types; see the last entry "DNG Type API: Query, retrieval and manipulation for types" here https://jazz.net/wiki/bin/view/Main/DNGServerAPI