It's all about the answers!

Ask a question
QuestionsTagsUsersBadges
Guidelines | FAQ
Follow this question
Question details

×10,952

question asked: Nov 18 '09, 6:53 a.m.
question was seen: 5,589 times
last updated: Nov 18 '09, 6:53 a.m.

Related questions

Archive project areas in RQM 2.0.0.1 does not work

0
Ana Lopez-Mancisidor (256●4●89●67) | asked Nov 18 '09, 6:53 a.m.
JAZZ DEVELOPER
Hi,

I am trying to archive a project area in RQM 2.0.0.1 (I am logged as a
user with admin permission to save and archive project areas) and
although there is no error message and while I am logged the archived
project area is not showed, when I logout from RQM and login in again
the project area is active again although was previously archived.

Anyone has also experienced this behaviour ?

Thanks,

Ana

4 answers

Most liked answers ↑|Newest answers|Oldest answers

0
permanent link
Mark Ottaviani (31●1●1) | answered Nov 18 '09, 9:15 a.m.
I have the same problem.
0
permanent link
Patrick Van Zandt (1.2k●1) | answered Nov 19 '09, 1:49 a.m.
JAZZ DEVELOPER
Question: Are you trying to archive the default project area (Quality Manager)? If yes, this is expected behavior. See:
https://jazz.net/jazz02/web/projects/Rational%20Quality%20Manager#action=com.ibm.team.workitem.viewWorkItem&id=23059
0
permanent link
Ana Lopez-Mancisidor (256●4●89●67) | answered Nov 19 '09, 2:53 a.m.
JAZZ DEVELOPER
On 11/19/2009 7:52 AM, patrick.vanzandt wrote:
Question: Are you trying to archive the default project area (Quality
Manager)? If yes, this is expected behavior. See:
https://jazz.net/jazz02/web/projects/Rational%20Quality%20Manager#action=com.ibm.team.workitem.viewWorkItem&id=23059

Thanks Patrick. Yes, the project area I was trying to archive was

Quality+Manager. This is why I had this behaviour
0
permanent link
Mark Ottaviani (31●1●1) | answered Nov 23 '09, 3:24 p.m.
Thanks patrick, that is what I was trying to do.

Your answer

Register or to post your answer.


Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.