Jazz Forum Welcome to the Jazz Community Forum Connect and collaborate with IBM Engineering experts and users

Renaming a copied commandline Test Script leads to damaged backlinks to the Original TestScript

Questions
Tags
Users
Badges
Bharath Rao
(915●2●41) edited
Jun 29 '20, 2:47 a.m.

When we create a copy of the Test Script, the backlinks to the original Test Script in the copied test script is damaged.

We see the below error when the link is clicked:
Unable to retrieve the specified artifact

Test Script itemId: null id:-1.

What is the reason ?

0 votes

Comments
Fabian Lomeli
Jun 26 '20, 3:25 p.m.
Hello Bharath, I just tried a quick test on my 6.0.6.1 env and could not reproduce the same.  Can you provide the exact steps you did to reproduce the problem?

How did you create the original testscript? how did you do create the copied one? was a duplicate operation, what options did you use? and where did you click on the link to get the error?

Bharath Rao
Jun 29 '20, 2:58 a.m.
Hi Fabian,

Here are the steps I followed in 6.0.6.1 iFix010:
a. Create a command line Test Script
b. Click on the test script to open it
c. Use the Duplicate button on the Test Script to create a duplicate.
d. Once the duplicate test script is seen, rename the Duplicated Test Script and save it.
At this point you will notice that the link to the original script will already be invalid.
Here is the screenshot:


PS: I had missed to specify the issue is specific to Command Line Scripts.

2 answers
1,309 views
0 votes

2 answers

Permanent link
Bharath Rao
(915●2●41) Jun 19 '20, 11:11 a.m.

RQM 6.0.5 iFix009


The issue is also seen in 6.0.6.1. However, in (RQM)ETM 7.0, the issue is fixed.

As a workaround, you can refresh the webpage after creating a Test Script copy. We then see the correct link.

Hence, this appears to be an issue with UI and there is no issue with the data in RQM.

0 votes

Permanent link
Fabian Lomeli
(101●3) Jul 06 '20, 5:20 p.m.
I have not identified an existent defect yet that states this is already fixed in 7.0+.  You can file a defect and document the workaround you have found.

But I think it is better to contact IBM Support and provide the qm.log and .har file from you browser for further analysis.  It seems to be a valid defect.

0 votes

Your answer

Register or log in to post your answer.

Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.

Ask a question
Guidelines
FAQ
Search context
Follow this question

By Email: 

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here.

By RSS:

Answers
Answers and Comments
Question details
× 43

Question asked: Jun 19 '20, 11:06 a.m.

Question was seen: 1,309 times

Last updated: Jul 06 '20, 5:20 p.m.

Confirmation Cancel Confirm