It's all about the answers!

Ask a question
QuestionsTagsUsersBadges
Follow this question
Question details

×42,503
×7,159
×5,903

question asked: Feb 15 '18, 11:51 a.m.
question was seen: 1,218 times
last updated: Feb 22 '18, 3:44 a.m.

Related questions

FAQ - How this Forum works

make sure "planned for" and "filed against" are compatible

0
Bernd van Oostrum (217●2●46●67) | asked Feb 15 '18, 11:51 a.m.

How can I ensure that a workitem's "planned for"-attirbute contains a value that corresponds with the selected "filed against"-attribute given that I have multiple teams working on dedicated timelines.


Currently, it is possible to assign a combination of "filed against"-values and "planned for"-value that do not correspond (for instance a planned for value from a different timeline than indicated in the filed against field)

Best regards,
Bernd.

2 answers

Most liked answers ↑|Newest answers|Oldest answers

0
permanent link
Donald Nong (14.5k●3●14) | answered Feb 18 '18, 7:49 p.m.

Have you considered writing a customized validator?

Comments
Bernd van Oostrum commented Feb 19 '18, 4:22 a.m. | edited Feb 22 '18, 3:40 a.m.

 Hi Donald,


Not really...
I think it should be impossible to select an invalid combination of "filed against" and "planned for" values out of the box...

Best regards,
Bernd.

0
permanent link
Geoffrey Clemm (30.1k●2●30●35) | answered Feb 22 '18, 3:44 a.m.
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR / FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER
edited Feb 22 '18, 3:44 a.m.

RTC will flag an invalid combination of filed-against and planned-for as warning when you view that work item in the GUI.   The reason RTC cannot make it impossible is that this would make it impossible to reassign a category to a team area in a different timeline.

Your answer

Register or to post your answer.