Are accepting CS via Task different from accepting via changing Flow target?
Karthik Krishnan (884●5●119●163)
| asked Jun 08 '16, 7:26 a.m.
edited Jun 08 '16, 10:50 a.m. by David Lafreniere (4.8k●7)
What are the differences when accepting a change set from a Task in comparison with accepting the change set by changing a flow target ?
What if the source is of same base and what hapens if it isn't?
|
Accepted answer
Ralph Schoon (63.3k●3●36●46)
| answered Jun 08 '16, 8:44 a.m.
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR / FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER edited Jun 08 '16, 10:51 a.m. by David Lafreniere (4.8k●7)
The only difference I am aware of is, that the change set on the work item does not show change sets it depends on. Accepting the change set could create a gap. Gap handling used to be problematic, but the last releases improved the situation. See this Improved Gap Handling for SCM. Obviously you could accept less content if you accept a change set (and the gaps) compared with using flow targets. However, I think both can be valid approaches.
Karthik Krishnan selected this answer as the correct answer
|
Your answer
Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.