Operation ids for event management
Hi, I would like to create new follow-up plugin for event management. Particularly I'm interested on "Build result changed" and "Work Item State Changed Event" operations but I have not the operation ids to inserert on plugin definition.
Which are these operation ids? Thank you very much. |
5 answers
Jared Burns (4.5k●2●9)
| answered Aug 06 '09, 8:55 a.m.
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR / FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER
On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:23:03 +0000, mikyjpeg wrote:
Maybe I have not understand clearly the relationship between In the Process realm, Change Events are analogous to Operations and Event Handlers are analogous to Follow-up Actions. Just as you can register follow-up actions for operations, you can register handlers for events. Once your event handler is registered, teams can configure your event handler in their process. I'm not sure if we have a comprehensive list of the Operations and Change Events that RTC contributes. If I wanted to know a change event id, here's what I'd do: 1. Open a project area and go to the Process Configuration Source tab. 2. Place the cursor inside the "behavior" element inside the "team- configuration" element (if they don't exist, create them). 3. Press ctrl+shift to summon code assist and select the "Change Event" template to insert a change-event element. The template will automatically select the id attribute 4. Press ctrl+shift again to summon code assist. This will list the set of available change events. If you select one, it will insert the id for that event into the text. -- Jared Burns Jazz Process Team |
Maybe I have not understand clearly the relationship between event/follow-up actions.
In process configuration there is a section on event handling. For example: "WorkItem State Changed Event" is an Event or an Event Handler? So do I have to write an EventHandler extension or a simple follow-up extension? And, in both case, which are the ids to use in order to catch that event? Is there a list of this event category ids?? The problem is that there is no example or snippets, no predefined follow-up linked to an event (instead of behaviour where I had find example that drive me to write pre-condition and follow-up extensions). |
This is great, I have not think that it could run on process configuration source. It works perfectly, thank you! Back to handlers I understand. Maybe the word "follow-up" is confusing in this case because the two things (behaviour follow-up and event follow-up) are developed in two different ways. Thank you. |
Jared Burns (4.5k●2●9)
| answered Aug 07 '09, 8:25 a.m.
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR / FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER
On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 07:38:05 +0000, mikyjpeg wrote:
This is great, I have not think that it could run on process Right. Event handlers aren't exactly the same as operation follow-up actions, but we use the same term ("follow-up action") in the syntax and the UI because the implementation differences don't matter to people trying to use the product. -- Jared Burns Jazz Process Team |
https://jazz.net/wiki/bin/view/Main/CustomPreconditionsTable#operations
|
Your answer
Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.