Jazz Forum Welcome to the Jazz Community Forum Connect and collaborate with IBM Engineering experts and users

Should "synchronize" always count as a work item change?

Say you have modified your process configuration to add a new value to an enumeration. You "synchronize" all your project's work items to allow users to employ the new value.

This "synchronize" operation has at least three consequences which I wonder whether they are intended:
* This is recorded as an empty change in the work item history
* An e-mail notification is sent out to each subscriber
* The work item will be picked up by Java ETL builds such as WorkItemHistory and WorkItemBaseline.

Is this intended behavior or maybe a defect?

Observed in RTC 4.0.3.

0 votes


Accepted answer

Permanent link
You only need to "synchronize" if you added new attributes to a work item type and want to introduce them to all existing work items of that type.
In general "synchronize" attributes reapplies the type. What you see is by design, if you disagree, please create an enhancement request.
Erik Mats selected this answer as the correct answer

0 votes

Your answer

Register or log in to post your answer.

Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.

Search context
Follow this question

By Email: 

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here.

By RSS:

Answers
Answers and Comments
Question details
× 53

Question asked: Nov 11 '15, 3:25 a.m.

Question was seen: 2,712 times

Last updated: Nov 11 '15, 5:12 a.m.

Confirmation Cancel Confirm