It's all about the answers!

Ask a question
QuestionsTagsUsersBadges
Guidelines | FAQ
Follow this question
Question details

×42,884
×6,115

question asked: Oct 15 '15, 3:17 a.m.
question was seen: 1,929 times
last updated: Oct 15 '15, 4:15 a.m.

Related questions

Error during RTC 5.0.2 extensibility

0
Nikita Dhande (35●1●10) | asked Oct 15 '15, 3:17 a.m.
 Hi,

I m working on RTC 5.0.2 extensibility.

I have followed all the steps of WorkshopSetup pdf, but am getting error in one step: (Test connecting the Eclipse debugger to Tomcat) Navigate -> Open Type ->
ActiveServiceDTO. I cannot see this option in the available types.

Have I gone wrong somewhere in the steps or anywhere else?

One answer

Most liked answers ↑|Newest answers|Oldest answers

0
permanent link
Ralph Schoon (63.7k●3●36●48) | answered Oct 15 '15, 3:22 a.m.
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR / FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER
What you describe is not an error, but you don't see what you expected to see. I would suggest to carefully perform the lab 1 steps before this one. You likely experience one of the following problems:

  1. Failed to setup the client with the SDK Target Platform
  2. Missed to add the Target Platform's Plugins to the Java search
Comments
Nikita Dhande commented Oct 15 '15, 3:35 a.m. | edited Oct 15 '15, 3:40 a.m.

 I have followed both these steps correctly.

Also I am getting many errors in Eclipse Client Error Log.

Ralph Schoon commented Oct 15 '15, 4:15 a.m.
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR / FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER

If you did, you would be able to find that class. I have done this with almost all versions of RTC since 3.0 and it always worked. Experience shows it is not a problem with the workshop, it is usually user errors e.g. not checking the right check boxes during the import steps for the SDK and while setting up the workspace.

I tried to see your errors in Eclipse using my crystal ball. Didn't work.

Your answer

Register or to post your answer.


Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.