How to associate a Build Record with a testcase execution in the RQM command line execution ?

We don't  support this currently you can file an enhancement.

The ability to specific a build ID via an Execution Tool argument was added to RQM 6.0.

https://jazz.net/downloads/rational-quality-manager/releases/6.0?p=news#TOC_E

You can use two new optional arguments in the execution tool, for both command-line and ANT tasks.

-buildRecord=<web ID of the Build Record> : The web ID of the build record that must be linked to the test case result that was created when the test case execution record ran.

-suiteBuildRecord=<web ID of the Build Record> : The web ID of the build record that must be linked to the test suite result and test case result that were created when the test suite execution record ran.

Which version of RQM you are using ? You can choose the available build records and associate while executing a command line script.
Create a command line script and associate that with a Test case. Create a build record. Now run the testcase in the popup GUI you can see an option to select Build Record a pencil like button click on that.
List of build records will be listed select the required and run. Once the execution is complete the result will show the build record.

If during the execution you forgot to associate the build record then the result will show unassigned for the build record . Now also you can associate the build record information to the result

We are using RQM 4.0 itself , I am referring to the RQM command line test case execution tool (https://jazz.net/wiki/bin/view/Main/RQMExecutionTool ) which doesn't provide any option to set the build record or build definition . We have around 1000 + testcases to be executed on automated basis and definitely opening the GUI and setting the build for this 1000 odd results is not feasible option ..

I am wondering what is provided in GUi to associate the build record .. how do we do that in command line execution , or RQM does not support it (I feel it does )

Another client reported the same issue, I created RFE # 98290 on this.
Best Regards, Sunil