What's the recommended way to represent an iterative process in RRC?

Hamish Currie

(11●1●1●1) May 30 '13, 11:28 a.m.

BPMN 2.0 has an indicator against a process to show that it is an iterative (repeating) process. You know, the sort of thing that you might have written "Do until" for in COBOL. RRC doesn't have this symbol. What's the community's view on best practice for this?

Thanks.

0 votes

1 answer

6,151 views

0 votes

One answer

Permanent link

Hamish Currie

(11●1●1●1) May 31 '13, 9:56 a.m.

Hah! Well we reckon we're going to add a recursive flow line (i.e. back to the same process step) and name the flow something like "For every outstanding credit note". Thoughts?

0 votes

Your answer

Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here.

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Question details

usage

× 12,075

rational-requirements-composer

× 3,951

process

× 89

iterative

× 1

Question asked: May 30 '13, 11:28 a.m.

Question was seen: 6,151 times

Last updated: May 31 '13, 9:56 a.m.

What's the recommended way to represent an iterative process in RRC?

Hamish Currie

1 answer

6,151 views

0 votes

One answer

Hamish Currie

Your answer

Follow this question

Question details

Related questions