It's all about the answers!

Ask a question
QuestionsTagsUsersBadges
Guidelines | FAQ
Follow this question
Question details

×10,962
×10,916
×198
×92
×7
×2
×2

question asked: May 29 '13, 9:52 a.m.
question was seen: 7,011 times
last updated: Jun 04 '13, 4:57 a.m.

Related questions

Where do step level trace links show-up in DOORS?

0
Paul Spalitta (81●4●30●37) | asked May 29 '13, 9:52 a.m.
If I link DOORS requirements to steps in RQM Test Scripts where IN DOORS can I view those requirement links? I can find the links to RQM Test Cases but I don't see the links to RQM Test Script steps.

One answer

Most liked answers ↑|Newest answers|Oldest answers

0
permanent link
Bing Dong Ma (196●2) | answered May 30 '13, 3:08 a.m.
JAZZ DEVELOPER
Hi Paul,

There is no link requirement->scriptstep created when you link DOORS requirement to steps in RQM Test Scripts.

Best Regards,

Bing Dong
Comments
Paul Spalitta commented May 30 '13, 9:18 a.m.

Hi Bing Dong,


Without such links it seems like the standard use cases are not currently supported for step level tracing:
A. Creating requirement to test step traceability reports.
B. Being able to check that all requirements are mapped to steps.

Are there features in DOORS that support those use cases?

Thanks,

Paul

Paul Spalitta commented May 30 '13, 11:12 a.m.

Hi Bing Dong,


One more question on this thread: does RM provide this capability (step level links)?

Thanks,

Paul

Bing Dong Ma commented Jun 04 '13, 4:57 a.m.
JAZZ DEVELOPER
Hi Paul,

Here is one story in RQM for bi-directional script step and requirement linking As a User, I want to be able to link/unlink the test script step with requirement from consumers of the QM OSLC API (78530), but now it's put into backlog because of technical obstacle.  Now it's not sure when it's planned but we are moving forward the dependence.


RM also hasn't this capability now.

Best Regards,

Bing Dong

Your answer

Register or to post your answer.


Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.