Jazz Forum Welcome to the Jazz Community Forum Connect and collaborate with IBM Engineering experts and users

Upgrading from RTC 2 to 3.0.1- Repotools fails on Creating Jazz tables

when running the command
./repotools-jazz.sh -createTables -clean
 
to setup the database migration from 2 to 3, the command fails with :
CRJAZ0812I Failed to drop the schema "APT_SNAPSHOT".

i have checked and the db2 user does have all the admin rights necessary.

Please help.

0 votes

Comments

Hello Amin,
Could you refer me to the documentation you are using to upgrade? I have reviewed infocenter: http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/clmhelp/v3r0m1/topic/com.ibm.jazz.install.doc/topics/t_upgrade_jts.html and I didn't find following command to be executed.

Its under "settng up the database" topicc for db2 



3 answers

Permanent link
Hi Amin -

The upgrade from RTC2 to 3.0.1 includes separating out the Jazz Team Server as an application with its own database. You will need to create a new DB2 database for the 3.0.1 JTS. The RTC 2 DB2 database will be upgraded to the RTC 3.0.1 format via a reptools-jazz --addTables command. You may also want to create yet another DB2 database at this point for a data warehouse.

There are upgrade wrapper scripts that can help you through the series of repotools commands that are necessary to separate out the JTS information from RTC. The documentation is here:
Upgrading RTC2 using scripts
Let me know if you have more questions.



0 votes


Permanent link
Also Amin -

Be sure to go back to a "pre-createTables" version of your RTC 2 database before starting this upgrade process as unfortunately, that command may have dropped some tables.

Again, let me know if you have questions - I did many upgrades as part of testing the 3.0.1 release.

Gail

0 votes


Permanent link
 One other note of caution.  Make sure that you are using a supported version of DB2.  I do know of one other customer that had an issue with an older version of DB2 not supporting the new tablenames on an upgrade.  I Believe that it had something to do with the tablename being too long for the earlier version of DB2 to handle.  

0 votes

Your answer

Register or log in to post your answer.

Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.

Search context
Follow this question

By Email: 

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here.

By RSS:

Answers
Answers and Comments
Question details
× 2,357
× 343
× 267
× 119
× 82

Question asked: Apr 02 '13, 6:42 p.m.

Question was seen: 7,088 times

Last updated: Apr 05 '13, 5:19 p.m.

Confirmation Cancel Confirm