Jazz Forum Welcome to the Jazz Community Forum Connect and collaborate with IBM Engineering experts and users

Advanced burndown chart not showing right priorities

Hi, my advanced burn down chart is showing all high priority story points as low priority. We have done some customizations on our project area configuration to do with work item priorities.

Does anyone know what's the best way to debug this? Or any idea what the issue maybe?

We are using the default Advanced Burndown chart from RTC 3.0.1. I can use 4.0 client if needed.

Thanks
Leyla

0 votes

Comments

I also have customers asking this same question.  RTC 3.0.1.3 server.  No DW failures on the CCM server.   The priority enumeration does have several 'non-standard' entries, but the workitems_snapshot.priority table has apparently properly encoded values for Unassigned, Low, Medium and High that contain the proper ID value in the priority enumeration definition.

What gives?


Hi Ramer, what do you mean by 'proper ID value in the priority enumeration definition' ?

The IDs for High to unassigned priorities need to be in high - low order for the chart to work properly.

I opened a defect against RTC, please see here for more information:

https://jazz.net/jazz/resource/itemName/com.ibm.team.workitem.WorkItem/233987

Best

Leyla

In the table I mentioned are 2 columns, PRIORITY_ID, WI_PRIORITY.  Values look like:

_v4bhULe7EeCTyKmQhF118Qppriority.literal.l01   for PRIORITY_ID
Unassigned, Low, Medium, High for WI_PRIORITY.  

The string I emphasized is the ITEM_ID for the project area in question and the priority.literal.lxx agree with the process xml.

I'll look at this work item.

Neither your response nor the work item really define what the true ordering should be.  Both say high-low, but does that mean:

id="literal.00" name="High"
id="literal.01" name="Medium"
id="literal.02" name="Low"
id="literal.03" name="Nit"

OR

id="literal.03" name="High"
id="literal.02" name="Medium"
id="literal.01" name="Low"
id="literal.00" name="Nit"



Be the first one to answer this question!

Register or log in to post your answer.

Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.

Search context
Follow this question

By Email: 

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here.

By RSS:

Answers
Answers and Comments
Question details
× 12,020

Question asked: Aug 21 '12, 9:59 p.m.

Question was seen: 4,180 times

Last updated: Nov 14 '12, 8:59 a.m.

Confirmation Cancel Confirm