It's all about the answers!

Ask a question
QuestionsTagsUsersBadges
Follow this question
Question details

×42,788

question asked: Jan 19 '12, 9:44 a.m.
question was seen: 4,892 times
last updated: Jan 19 '12, 9:44 a.m.

Related questions

FAQ - How this Forum works

Changeset comment leave the workitem off?

0
James Palmer (33●4●9) | asked Jan 19 '12, 9:44 a.m.
Is there anyway to leave the workitem title off of the changeset comment. This really clutters it up and, since that is always first, it is much harder to find the actual comment.

I'm using 3.0.1.

please help?

4 answers

Most liked answers ↑|Newest answers|Oldest answers

0
permanent link
James Palmer (33●4●9) | answered Jan 19 '12, 9:45 a.m.
a little more info... our operational behavior requires both an associated work item and a comment, so all of our changesets have the associated work item title in the comment... very annoying!
0
permanent link
Tim Mok (6.6k●3●8) | answered Jan 19 '12, 10:08 a.m.
JAZZ DEVELOPER
Is there anyway to leave the workitem title off of the changeset comment. This really clutters it up and, since that is always first, it is much harder to find the actual comment.

I'm using 3.0.1.

please help?
You'll have to open an enhancement for this. For the time being, Pending Changes has preferences to show/hide the work item on change sets (I think outgoing changes only). The Change Explorer doesn't have anything to filter out the work item.
0
permanent link
James Palmer (33●4●9) | answered Jan 19 '12, 10:21 a.m.
Created enhancement request 191948
0
permanent link
Geoffrey Clemm (30.1k●3●30●35) | answered Jan 19 '12, 11:53 p.m.
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR / FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER
When you say "your operational behavior requires both an associated work
item and a comment". The only reason I can see requiring both is if the
change-set comment is supposed to have more detailed information than is
specified in the work item summary. In that case, having the same
string in both would violate the policy. On the other hand, if it is
acceptable to have the same string in both the comment and the work item
summary, then the policy requiring both is just wrong, and should be
changed. Please feel free to have whoever is setting that policy give
me a call if they need to be convinced on why it is just wrong.

Cheers,
Geoff

On 1/19/2012 9:53 AM, jhpalmer wrote:
a little more info... our operational behavior requires both an
associated work item and a comment, so all of our changesets have the
associated work item title in the comment... very annoying!

Your answer

Register or to post your answer.


Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.