RTC enhancement/review best practice question
Hi,
I am new to RTC and I wanted to see if I could get some opinions on best practice for handling enhancements that come back after a reviewed. Here is my question: A developer works on the enhancement and then submits it for review. At this point the developer has completed their work and closed their enhancement work item. A parent work item which contains the enhancement is submitted for review. Post review there is a determination to modify the enhancement. Should the modification be a modify to the original enhancement work item or should it be a new work item attached to the review as a link? Thanks, Austin |
2 answers
Geoffrey Clemm (30.1k●3●30●35)
| answered Mar 24 '11, 6:19 p.m.
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR / FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER
The short answer is "both approaches are reasonable".
In the former case, there are fewer work items floating around your system. In the latter case, you have a record of how much work/time went into the original work, vs. the work/time that went into the modification. So it really depends which works better for you. Cheers, Geoff On 3/24/2011 9:53 AM, atyler2010 wrote: Hi, |
Hi Geoff,
I like how you point out the ability to capture the modification time by the number of enhancements added to the review. I think I can make this work. Thanks for the reply, Austin The short answer is "both approaches are reasonable". Hi, |
Your answer
Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.