It's all about the answers!

Ask a question
QuestionsTagsUsersBadges
Guidelines | FAQ
Follow this question
Question details

×10,962

question asked: Feb 14 '11, 7:36 a.m.
question was seen: 5,024 times
last updated: Feb 14 '11, 7:36 a.m.

Related questions

How-to: post work item in RTC 2.0 from a test plan in RQm 2.

0
Olivier Béghain (108●22●34) | asked Feb 14 '11, 7:36 a.m.
Hello,

During the execution of our test plans, we sometimes have remarks that raen'ts specific to particular test cases but that need attention. Therefore we would like to post in the RTC 2.0 project (linked to the RQM 2.0 project) a work item that express our concerns but is also "attached to" the test plan from which the concern raised.

Until now, we can only have RTC defects created from test execution records and RRC requirements collections linked to RQM test cases.

In other words: create a work item of type xyz in RTC from RQM and have it linked to a particular test plan.

Thx in advance.
Regards

One answer

Most liked answers ↑|Newest answers|Oldest answers

0
permanent link
Paul Slauenwhite (8.4k●1●2) | answered Feb 15 '11, 7:09 a.m.
FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER
Hello,

During the execution of our test plans, we sometimes have remarks that raen'ts specific to particular test cases but that need attention. Therefore we would like to post in the RTC 2.0 project (linked to the RQM 2.0 project) a work item that express our concerns but is also "attached to" the test plan from which the concern raised.

Until now, we can only have RTC defects created from test execution records and RRC requirements collections linked to RQM test cases.

In other words: create a work item of type xyz in RTC from RQM and have it linked to a particular test plan.

Thx in advance.
Regards


In RQM 2.x, you cannot link a test plan to a RTC work item. In RQM 3.x, you can link a test plan to a development plan, which can reference RTC work items.

Your answer

Register or to post your answer.


Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.