It's all about the answers!

Ask a question

Are TERs necessary for Result Histories?


David Hanslip (23124448) | asked Feb 08 '11, 8:42 p.m.
According to the RQM online help

"Test execution records map the test environment information to the test case. They specify the hardware and software environment for execution."

So, if you only ever test on a single test environment, you don't need to use TERs.

However, are TERs necessary to be able to see a Result History for a Test Case?

Thanks. Dave.

2 answers



permanent link
Kurtis Martin (1.4k11) | answered Feb 09 '11, 11:53 a.m.
JAZZ DEVELOPER
TERs are necessary. All Test Case execution happens in the context of a TER. It's a central artifact of RQM execution. Not only does it allow you to show the Result History, but it also ties into reporting. Several of the reports are centered around TER (e.g. Execution Status using TER count).

Even if you only use a single test environment, you would likely want to use TERs to capture the planning information for your test execution. That is, which Test Plan and which milestone you plan to execute a given test case.

There are several ways TERs can be created. If you just hit the run button at the top of the test case editor, then the run dialog will give you the option to create a new TER. You don't even have to specify the test environment. That's a shortcut for folks that think creating TERs individually or via the wizard is too much trouble. However using this approach doesn't give you any of the planning benefits of reporting.

permanent link
David Hanslip (23124448) | answered Feb 09 '11, 11:40 p.m.
Thanks Kurtis. This is most helpful. The help stated that TERs were optional but you make some good points for their use even when testing on only a single environment.

Your answer


Register or to post your answer.


Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.