DNG 6.0.6 - Export DNG review comments on module artifacts
![]() Hi All - we're currently on 6.0.6 & planning migration to 7.x in Q3'20.
We are using the DNG Review flow. We add one or more module artifacts to the DNG Review and then review the module's artifacts in that Rreview. I need to be able to export each module's artifact's review comments for tracking purposes. We specifically need to know which Comments are OPEN or RESOLVED.
I have read several requests to add basic usability features to DNG reviews...so don't expect this to be working in 6.0.6. However, I absolutely need a solution in 7.x.
What are others doing to track DNG Reviews...other than manually clicking thru & writing down the results in a spreadsheet?
|
6 answers
![]() Hi Kelly,
We are on 6.0.6 and here's what works pretty well for us. If you use a View for the Review, then you can Generate a Report for the View (selected from the pencil menu next to the View name). There's an option to "include comments" in that report. The resulting report does display the status of the comments. I Resolved one of the comments and left the other open, and it shows their State correctly. The Table version works best, I used Word for the below example.
![]()
Hope this helps,
Carol
|
![]() You can only include Artifact Comments in "Print Module Table" report, but not review comments. In DNG, from Reviews page, you can choose "Generate Report for Review", in which you can include comments on review as well as reviewers' comments. |
![]() Hello Carol,
We have some review comments included within the module say X.
When I try to generate report for view, I dont see the review comments on the artifiact level when I export.
Can you please explain clearly?
Thanks for your help.
Best regards
|
![]() It looks like this feature is not implemented curretnly by IBM,
Best regards,
Shriraam
|
Comments
Hi Carol - thanks for the quick response. I was ready to do a dance after I saw your reply. However, the Report doesn't export 'Review Comments'. We capture 'Review Comments', instead of 'Comments', for (2) reasons.