It's all about the answers!

Ask a question
QuestionsTagsUsersBadges
Guidelines | FAQ
Follow this question
Question details

×359
×218

question asked: May 28 '18, 6:43 a.m.
question was seen: 1,946 times
last updated: Sep 11 '18, 2:55 a.m.

Related questions

JRS report to show test coverage for the requirements

0
Bharti Arora (15●6) | asked May 28 '18, 6:43 a.m.

 Hi,


I am trying to create a report where i want to see the total number of requirements in a collection and those requirements which are covered by any test cases.
In my case , the conditions are 
Requirements have State (Requirements_v1.01): Confirmed or Approved 
Requirements are part of a release collection named 'Foundation'.

I tried to create the report with above conditions and artifact relation ship as below:
Collection or Module -> Requirement (Required) -> Validated by test Cases (Optional).

Now if i use the 'Add caculated value items' for test cases and requirements , it shows one bar for total requirements and another with total test cases. In case we have one test case covering one requirement then this report is okay, but if link more than one test cases, which is usually the most common scenario, with one requirement this report will not show the correct data.

Could anyone please help me how can i create a report to such kind of data:
Total requirements
Requirements linked to any test cases

Thanks and Regards,
Arora


One answer

Most liked answers ↑|Newest answers|Oldest answers

0
permanent link
Kathryn Fryer (503●1●4●7) | answered May 28 '18, 9:26 a.m.

Hi Arora, what version of the product are you using?  Can you do multiple traceability paths?
If so, you could try:

Collection or Module > Requirement (Required)
                                 > Requirement1 (required) > Test Case (required)

Then do the sum on Requirement for total requirements, and the sum on Requirement1 for those with test cases.

Your answer

Register or to post your answer.


Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.