Is it possible to limit scope or hide communities which users do not have access to?
Is it possible to limit scope or hide the visibility of communities which users do not have access to?
I am aware that community access can be restricted. When this is done the community gets "greyed out" but the community it is still visible. Is it possible to hide it completely? For this project it is important that each group of users can only see their related community.
Alternatively has any work been done on IRAM multitenancy? Is there any way to virtualise multiple RAM instances on one server to create a customised view for each group of users?
My question is similar to this one from two years ago, just hoping some functionality has been added to overcome this since.
https://jazz.net/forum/questions/96870/hide-communities-from-end-users
One answer
Hi,
I think the feature you would like is not implemented at this moment.
I think RAM treats community as resource container, or service provider, it need to be visible to users as entrance to resources(assets), and you can find it in oslc service catalog. User role is used to manage manage the behaves user could perform to the resources contained in one community. So community is like a box which is used to contain assets, every one can see the box, however if you have no access to the box, you have no idea what is inside.
I think the feature you would like is not implemented at this moment.
I think RAM treats community as resource container, or service provider, it need to be visible to users as entrance to resources(assets), and you can find it in oslc service catalog. User role is used to manage manage the behaves user could perform to the resources contained in one community. So community is like a box which is used to contain assets, every one can see the box, however if you have no access to the box, you have no idea what is inside.